I teach my writing class today. I'm supposed to talk about ChatGPT. Here's what I will say.
NEVER USE CHATGPT. YOU ARE HERE TO LEARN HOW TO WRITE ABOUT SCIENCE, YOU WILL NOT ACCOMPLISH THAT BY USING A GODDAMNED CRUTCH THAT WILL JUST MAKE SHIT UP TO FILL THE SPACE. WRITE. WRITE WITH YOUR BRAIN AND YOUR HANDS. DON'T ASK A DUMB CYBERMONKEY TO DO IT FOR YOU.
I have strong opinions on this matter.
@pzmyers I'm right there with ya!
My school asked us to do an "AI" day and plan activities to explore LLM's and such.
I sat each of my classes down and we had a serious discussion about the ethics and shortcomings of LLM's. Almost none of them were aware of how the program gathers (copyrighted) data or the immense environmental costs.
Personally, I struggle to understand why anyone would want an LLM to write for them. The point of writing is self expression!
@AlexCorby @pzmyers
> The point of writing is self expression!
That may be true for some writing, but a *vast* amount of writing doesn't contain any personal expression at all; it just needs to be accurate and descriptive (think car manuals).
That's a fair point. However, with some of the nonsense that I'm catching coming out of these programs, I'm not sure I want my car manual written by ChatGPT either.
@dpnash @AlexCorby @pzmyers Lol, yeah, that's a great example of using a tool the wrong way. Trying to get specific facts out of a generalized language model is like trying to hammer a screw: Sometimes it works, but a lot of the time, it does more harm than good.