@rdaily Also more to the point (and can be seen even in your chart if you look carefully), mass shootings **increased** by about 30% immediately following and during the assault riffle ban (clearly it didnt work)... once the ban was lifted mass shootings continued to rise at about the same 30% rate.

This would suggest that the assault riffle band had absolutely no positive effect on mass shootings of any kind.

Follow

@freemo

It seems it took a couplr of years after the ban was initiated, seems to me like it is mostly unrelated to the rise(except the ease of getting weapons that it)..

I know that more guns do not necessarily mean more shootings(example, in israel pretty much everyone who drafts at 18 will prob shoot an m16, and a lot get to walk around with them home and everything), but this nation clearly shouldn't have guns(or knives(or anything that might kill, they seems pretty muxh unhinged somstimes))

@RustyStriker it is expected and always takes a few years for the inevitable rise to hit. Thats because when bans are passed there is several years before those guns get off the streets.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.