@freemo According to https://qoto.org/about/more says #hate_speech is against laws and one would be banned because of it.
Does this mean that a #Muslim expressing their religious belief about man-to-man intercourse is a hate speech? According to #Quran this is a shameful deed and according to #hadith there is death penalty for both parties having such an intercourse.
@farooqkz @freemo A lot was said here and i must admit i did not read all of it.
Stating (perceived) facts is not hate speech. The quaran might say that, or not. Saying that might be right, or not. But it is not hate speech.
Saying that some person or group should suffer some bad thing is.
So you might say the <whatever literature> says something, that is neutral.
Saying you agree with <whatever literature> might be uncomfortable to some, but is still acceptable if the literature is not clearly stipulating that bad things should happen to some person/group.
Like if you would agree with "Mein Kampf", that would be hate speech because it very specifically says that bad things should happen to a specific group, regardless of their personal actions.
The question is if you are discussing a thing or saying that some specific person or group should suffer for who they are.
Discussing and understanding what is meant is fine, directing hate at someone / a group just for a thing they cannot change is not.
Right, @freemo ?
