🧵 : this the first in a series of that will eventually be stitched together into a related to 📚 and 📘. (1)

Women in the History of Science: A sourcebook. 

"this book is an invaluable companion to students and lecturers alike in exploring women’s history in the fields of science, technology, mathematics, medicine and culture." uclpress.co.uk/products/211143 (2)

Women in the History of Science: A sourcebook. 

@bibliolater
What is the point of the CWs on these posts?

Women in the History of Science: A sourcebook. 

@qurlyjoe Would you prefer they were taken off?

Women in the History of Science: A sourcebook. 

@bibliolater
That’s not my call. I’m just wondering why you thought they were necessary.

Follow

Women in the History of Science: A sourcebook. 

@qurlyjoe Would I be wrong in using them in this way to save space?

Women in the History of Science: A sourcebook. 

@bibliolater
What do you mean by “save space” in this context.
BTW, I am not an authority in any sense on the use of CW. My understanding is the intent is to give readers the opportunity to preemptively avoid content they might find threatening or objectionable.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.