I'm thinking very hard about adopting this CoC for all my projects:
"No Code of Conduct: A Code of Conduct for Adults in Open Source Software"

github.com/domgetter/NCoC

I've actually been in favor of this for the longest time, but (until now) I just didn't add a CoC.

Why the change of heart?
Because the SJW mob is after #RMS again. And they are still WRONG.

If you believe the surveillance capitalist click-driven "journalists" instead of doing proper research, I don't want you near my projects.

"Selam G." clearly has a reading comprehension problem, because I read the 'notorious' thread too. In full. Including the referenced documents.
And I came to a completely different conclusion.

Yeah, that took me several hours. If your attention span is max 3 mins or are too lazy to read more then the click-baity headline, then you'll arrive at the WRONG conclusion.

Excellent write-ups:
sterling-archermedes.github.io
wetheweb.org/post/cancel-we-th

#RMS may not be a likeable man. Or wrong at times. So what?

Selam G.:
"I wrote this and the 'Appendix A' in 2019 to protect my community at MIT, and that is still what matters to me most."

Ah, that org that killed Aaron Swartz. How about we cancel that?

"how we can sustainably purge and rebuild."
Maybe start with purging MIT who actually did accept money from serial-child-rapist Jeffrey Epstein?

FTR: Marvin Minsky, the friend of RMS that he defended, declined to have sex with the woman/child he was 'presented'.
If you'd actually read it, you'd known.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.