@bohwaz
> It should be removed because... it is killing the planet? Sounds like a good reason to me.

i don't think the planet will be killed for another several billion years. even then: why are things like cars to be removed but not air travel, consumption of throwaway goods or the industry regulated?

thank you for the free introductionary course, but i know very well the difference between statistics and anecdote. i also know that you can tune statistics to prove the point you want to prove. i bet in those 6000€ don't include the better job opportunities due to a bigger radius of movement for example. statistics can and are twisted and tuned and it can be very hard to prove it without just resorting to accusations of ulterior motives.

the solutions of climate activists and politicians are usually as far, if not further, removed from the truth and being as good solution as my personal experience.

@nickofnz