I keep reading "de-globalisation" or "rolling back globalisation". Mind you, that climate action is the incarnation of globalisation, of global action.
The reason you read "de-globalisation" *now* is that we've reduced the word to economics, more specifically suppl chain economics. And we've done pretty stupid things, like producing stuff in one place where nobody can afford it, but labour cost is low, and shipping it to where people can afford it but labour cost is deemed too high to make it there.

We've been using "globalisation" as a label for exploitation. And so, it should say "de-expolitation" when we're discussing putting production where stuff is actually consumed.