Follow
Sooo, if you ever need a boolean output on whether a text contains at least one word of a list, you can code it in a single line in python, like this :D
```any([text.find(i)>0 for i in list])```
I feel a bit proud about figuring that out :'3 I guess a senior would do it way better tho. However, if that's the case, right now I don't feel like hearing/reading it, but as of tomorrow xD
@peterdrake OMG Thanksssss!!! 😍 😍 😍 that's waaaaayyyyy better 🖤 🖤 🖤
@dev_nadine Very solid!
Possible polish:
any([i in text for i in list])
It's certainly shorter, but only clearer if the reader can handle "in" being used in two different ways.
I'd also argue that "list" is not a good variable name, because it shadows the function for turning something into a list. The Scheme convention is to use "ls". The worst choice is "l", because it looks too much like an upper-case "i", a "1", or even a vertical pipe "|". So maybe:
any([w in text for w in words])