Call me old-fashioned but with my #ext4+#luks+#lvm setup I never had issues or lost data.

There are a lot of interesting new options available (#bcachefs, #zfs, #btrfs, etc), but I prefer stability and a piece of mind.

@Anachron
So you never had a disk die complete or partially or a disk delivering wrong data?
Lucky you. 👍
I still prefer #ZFS with redundancy and checksums for everything. ZFS saved me from all of the above, several times over the last 10+ years.

@jaxu @Anachron hell, I’ve never had a drive fail on me, but #zfs still saved my bacon with a restore from a recent snapshot when I deleted (the otherwise only copy of) a bunch of work with an errant command

@ivan @jaxu

I use regulary backups to store my data both locally on another drive and on a cloud storage for all my primary devices (except phones, for now).

I don't know how useful those checksums are if you have to fear for corruption due to issues in the implementention, see the recent openzfs problem.

Follow

@Anachron

zfs isn't about solving for backups. If you use zfs and your data is important, you should still have backups (zfs can help facilitate implement of a back up process). zfs is for making sure your data isn't corrupted and you can quickly fix, restore, and move your data in a way that gives more confidence that the data is what you intend it to be when want you use it.

@ivan @jaxu

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.