@xyfdi@gameliberty.club
The definition QOTO uses for harassment is rather strict. It means anyone who does not respect a users right to disengage.
If someone says go away, then go away, thats all.
@arteteco @realcaseyrollins @design_RG @mngrif @Surasanji @evaristus
@chikara When were you confronted with a claim of harassment from a QOTO moderator? When were you forced to endure the consequences of that?
I a, the head administrator here and I dont know of any incident where you were said to be engaging in harassment.
Whats the problem?
@freemo If I understand correctly, you're saying that QOTO has a policy or position on the subject of harassment. Where can I read this?
It appears that if someone -- anyone -- feels he or she is being harassed, it is essential that the complaint is made clear to the the so-called harasser, isn't it? If this simple step is missing, then there's a big logic gap, isn't there? Where can I read this?
The only time I've been confronted with a false claim of harassment is HERE in QOTO.
The only time I've been forced to endure the consequences of that false accusation of harassment is HERE in QOTO.
So this word matters to me.
IS THIS AN AXIOM? No question addressed to a Mastodon administrator can be harassment.
QUESTION? If a Mastodon administrator claims to be harassed, but there is NO written evidence that the so-called harasser was ever informed, then what has really happened?
QUESTION? In response to a question presented to a QOTO moderator, what would be a most appropriate descriptive term for a moderator's responsive complaint of harassment?
• responding to tone?
• ad hominem?
• name-calling? -- see image below, Graham's hierarchy of disagreement; and see"How to Disagree" http://www.paulgraham.com/disagree.html
HINT: The response I'm looking for is that this isn't going to happen in QOTO.
.
QOTO = Question Others to Teach Ourselves?