Follow

@hansw I beleive that is the question i answered.. if you dont feel I answered your question please elaborate how and i will try to.

My simple answer is, no one should have any right to force any other person to take a drug in order to have access to society. The one exception where I could find this acceptable is if the group setting is of a topic or situation that specifically hosts immunocompromised individuals. Like if they required people to have a full set of vaccines in order to get into the acancer ward of a hospital, or to visit a friend with a weak immune system, then by all means I think it is reasonable in those sorts of private settings to have restrictions out of medical necessity.

however if we are talking general group settings, then...

I am opposed to any law or societal norm that requested any medical information about me of any kind or requires that i take some drug regardless of my personal opinion about it

The issue here is two fold

1) I have an absolute right to complete confidentiality of my medical history and decisions

2) I should not be forced to take a drug in order to gain full access to society in general. That violates the principle of bodily autonomy.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.