🇳🇱
P is so obsessed he cant even think clearly... he has now been spamming my account for over a half hour now the dude is so far gone.
I think its pretty obvious he has issues and isnt thinking clearly...
Keep in mind this has been his obsession for over a year now.
> P is so obsessed he cant even think clearly... he has now been spamming my account for over a half hour now the dude is so far gone.
You demented honkey, I just fired off a shell script. This takes literally zero effort.
yes.png
thats not what makes you obsessed. what makes you obsessed is that your willing to act in a way that is illegal under US law and put your entire server at risk of being shut down all because your obsessed over a guy you argued with a year ago and you have been obsessed over every since.
It isnt a matter of effort, its a matter of just how much risk you are willing to put your community at for your own personal instabilities.
> illegal under US law
Go ahead and file charges.
there is more than enough documented evidence for both a slander and an harassment case against the server. so far it hasn't been enough of a nuisance to act as you have only directed your mental break down at me.
Regardless it is telling that you'd put the future of your entire server in jeopardy over your obsession over little ol' me... like i said, your only hurting yourself and looking like an unstable fool.
> there is more than enough documented evidence for both a slander and an harassment case against the server.
Please stop threatening to sue people over internet drama. It's not good for the Fediverse.
inb4 "I didn't threaten anything, I just made a statement" but we all know what you meant.
For context here is the whole message I replied with. Funny how the full message with context is the exact opposite of what you just suggested. Notice the second sentance right where you bothered to cut it off tha says "so far it hasn't been enough of a nuisance to act as you have only directed your mental break down at me."
there is more than enough documented evidence for both a slander and an harassment case against the server. so far it hasn't been enough of a nuisance to act as you have only directed your mental break down at me.
Regardless it is telling that you'd put the future of your entire server in jeopardy over your obsession over little ol' me... like i said, your only hurting yourself and looking like an unstable fool.
@grips @realcaseyrollins @modfaggotry @p @underwater @cowanon
> there is more than enough documented evidence for both a slander and an harassment case against the server.
Please show me how to bring charges against a computer.
Cite a law, please.
The very fact that this is happening over social media and not through a registered notice of concern (which can be an e-mail to the admin account, as long as you can provide suitable evidence that it was read.)
Also, it helps if you don't threaten litigation to the subject of complaint. The timbre of discussion indicates that this may have occurred.
Not saying this to advocate on anyone's position in or out of a court of law, just that I think officers of the court might be able to provide a much-needed reality check for anyone who threatens litigation so flippantly.
At no point was litigation threatened. In fact when I stated what he was doing was likely illegal I explicitly stated it wasnt enough of a nuisance for me to act on it legally. so you're good.
@grips @realcaseyrollins @modfaggotry @p @underwater @alex @cowanon
Yes it would be civil not criminal, agreed.
Again no one is suing anyone.. but making false claims and sending thousands of messages with the intent to cause harm is, as I said, risky business for any administrator. I really didnt care too mucha bout the libel/slander itself but once he intentionally started running scripts in an attempt to cripple my account, that was crossing a line and the point where he put the server in jeopardy
@grips @realcaseyrollins @modfaggotry @p @underwater @alex @cowanon
Slander and harassment are civil complaints, not criminal. If you can prove damage to reputation and livelihood occurring in a specific jurisdiction, then you would have to retain a personal injury attorney licensed within, because that's a legal injury. If you're trying to prove damages in diversity jurisdiction, you're going to get steamrolled.
The precedent, despite what a lot of wignats like to think, favors protection of criticism and commentary from chilling effect over any unintentional malice.
To offer an opinion I'm far more qualified to deliver: chill, bro, nobody wants to take away your livelihood. We talk a lot of shit on Fedi, but it's overall pretty chill. Your higher ups probably say worse.