@marathon ?Again even then it doesnt line up with the principle which **only?** applies when a judgement is being considered.

Cloudflare had dismissed the accusation and was not going to act on it. So neither the principle of facing your accuser nor the reason/ it is employed ?(to ensure the accusation is valid and defend against it?) applies here.

So even if you make the argument that it doesnt just apply to the government your stance still completely fails.

Again if you were to accuse someone o/f murder the murderer would NOT be told who you are unless and until it goes to court, for example.