🇳🇱
> I'm tired to argue these things.
When I told you to drop it,I mean it.
> Drop it or I will make it happen.
In the future I **will** continue to post on any posts like this you make to ensure in the replies it is debunked so others can see. However I will do as you ask and not tag you when i reply to your posts, just to ensure you do not engage in the discussion per your wishes. But people reading these sort of posts do need to see why and how they are debunked.
I will respond to your other points in my next message as a reply without tagging you, per your request.
Of course it was justice, the law was evaluate, found to be unfair, deemed illegal, and the votes from mail-in letters that werent postmarked **can not be counted**.
How is that not justice? The only thing is it had **absolutely no effect on the results of the election**, that doesnt make it unfair.
> Who have been hold accountable for these illegal activity?
It wasn't an illegal **activity** it was an illegal **law**, big difference. Again the number of letters that arrive accidentally missing a postmark are virtually 0, so it has **nothing** to do with the inauguration results and the problem was resolved regardless.
> Is there a full investigation of all known election frauds?
Investigations are for crimes where there is some evidence... a law which caused a few dozen letters to get counted that shouldn't have is not a crime nor indicative of anything needing investigation unless you can show it was evidence of some foul plot.
