It is a one or two time clear out as a growth process which has a trigger, sometimes it is suppressed in those deeply poisoned, like from those vaccinated and the trigger mechanism goes off way later (this happened to me when I was 17 as the MMR did great damage to my natural processes).
Most people believe they will get sick if someone else is sick, again because of sympathetic resonance. If you stop believing in contagion and then test yourself by hanging around someone ill, you will not get it. I have tested this myself. Once my beliefs changed, I stopped "catching" things.
Now, if you are locked into a room with no airflow with many sick people who are expressing their toxic matter, and you also are weakened by lack of proper nutrition, a clogged liver, a damaged energy field, over time you can absorb their wastes which will trigger a similar expression in yourself, a simple response to being poisoned (just as the famous nurse Florence Nightengale noticed and described). You did not CATCH it from a random bug floating through the air, this is complete myth and superstition, you earned it by gaining toxic credits into your body, which has important processes to remove the unwanted wastes.
The germ theory is completely false and we need to ascend our thinking away from myth, illusion & scientism, which is the religion of science and not actual science. The actual science proves no contagion and no germ causing any disease: the germ is the result of a diseased body and is there to serve the body to remove dead, dying or damaged tissue, to repair DNA and to push the wastes out.
Everything is energy and vibration. We have to remove ourselves from the illusion of physical matter and understand that we ARE made of microbes, every space, every surface is coated in microbes that will do no harm. The real harm is when we kill them off. It is a ticking time bomb the sleeping humans are creating by trying to kill everything in sight. This will create superbugs and imbalances to our bodies that will lead to disease and death. This will weaken the next generation that needs to learn as babies the microbial milieu of their environment in order to identify self vs non-self and to seed the entire body with healthy flora. The irony of what people are doing to themselves and their own lineage is palpable.
This is a call to accept and love yourselves, can we overcome self-hate enough to rise above the illusions? Or do we wish to destroy ourselves? Only time will tell." - Amandha Vollmer
#germtheory #contagion #scientism #science #fraud #vaccines #conspiracy #health #knowledge #information #resources #truth #relearning
@ohellno
Just the very existence of immune system disproves entire germ theory.
🇳🇱
This whole bit of unintelligent dribble can be disproven in all of 2 seconds.. take a pH strip touch it to a chicken pox sore quickly, and see if it shows an extremely low pH, which of course, it will not.
People love to make up whatever bullshit sounds right to them and fits the world they want to make up in their head and really have no intention of taking even a moment to verify it, if they did they might find out they were wrong and their ego can't handle that.
I just did a few searches to see if there was any information available for the results of a pH test for the secretions of chickenpox sores.
I found nothing. Since you seem to be sure, do you have any evidence describing any instances where this type of test was carried out?
There's plenty of information available that disproves the germ theory if you were to look. You can go to my website at parentofsociety.com and search for "germ theory hoax" and explore the resources listed in the references if you'd like.
Chickenpox is definitely not what we're told and isn't initiated by breathing in some imaginary virus.
I would totally test it myself if someone i knew had chickenpox.
I am not the one making outlandish claims, so I have no need to test their absurd theory... They indicated a theory without absolutely no evidence to back it up, evidence that would be trivial to gather. The lack of evidence and effort means the theory is not based on observed evidence but pulled out of their ass. That pattern alone is more than enough for me to discount it.
Now if they actually bothered to do **science** and test their assertions and presented that as part of their claim, then it would be less outlandish and would be a legitimate reason to expect scientists to repeat the test and see if the theory of acidic secretions has any basis in reality.
Its like me saying "Oh by the way unicorns are real, I can prove it because a bunch of poop you find in the woods has rainbows shooting out of it!"... and the nthem demanding scientist show we have done extensive studies disproving poop with rainbows coming out of it.. Its not mine or any other scientists wackadoo theory, so its not my obligation or that of other scientists to put any effort into it.
You can beleive whatever you want, but you are wrong and you look like an idiot for thinking otherwise.. Of course you think you are right, so feel free to do a study and get it peer reviewed. You will fail (Because your ideas are bullshit) but if you happen to gather any actual evidence then youll prove me wrong.
As for all the "evidence" disproving germ theory.. I've spent a lot of time int he past reading through many people who have came and claimed that and debated it.. all of it was complete idiotic nonsense, and not one bit of it held up to existing knowledge or understanding.
The hundreds of thousands of scientists working with viruses every day already prove its legitimate, most of what they do wouldnt work or make any sense if viruses werent real
"They can't all be wrong"
There are plenty of references and resources available on my site. So if you want to believe in viruses rather than dig in and find answers then do be it. I figured that you've have some kind of proof since it's easily disprovable in your words.
I would rather base what i know to be true from evidence, so enjoy your day.
I don't follow the herd of paid shills (scientists) but we are different people.
> "They can't all be wrong"
No I'm not. I'm basing it on the fact that I have seen and understand what they do in the lab, how they verify things, the scrutiny that goes on, and seeing with my own eyes and repeating some experiments on my own to know that what they say works, works. things that would never and could never work if viruses werent real.
> There are plenty of references and resources available on my site. So if you want to believe in viruses rather than dig in and find answers then do be it.
As I already said, I've already dug in plenty of resources, and they are all written by morons who dont know the first thing about logic or how to "prove" even the most basic things. I have no expectation that your claims are anything new that I havent already seen. However if you wish to bring your evidence into this conversation, go for it. I've done enough digging to know its idiocy, but if you happen to be the one person arguing this shit who has some real evidence, feel free to try to bring it.
> I would rather base what i know to be true from evidence, so enjoy your day.
Clearly not, there is a mountain of evidence and you seem to be pretending like it doesnt even exist, meanwhile you have presented none for your outlandish bullshit.
Good day, I certainly have no time for shoveling your bullshit
Here's one from part two of my series.
https://books.google.com/books?id=EQHPoGs6CvIC&pg=PA76&lpg=PA76&dq=There+are+no+specific+diseases;+there+are+specific+disease+condition+florence+nightingale&source=bl&ots=Ze2EHKUhqe&sig=ACfU3U0RYES_5QsbjpRZ3zlm2mGF-SaVAQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiX7NHv8qfoAhWOT98KHQvwApcQ6AEwFnoECCsQAQ#v=onepage&q=There%20are%20no%20specific%20diseases%3B%20there%20are%20specific%20disease%20condition%20florence%20nightingale&f=false
Simple bacterial forms like streptococci (pus germs) could be made to assume all of the characteristics of pnuemococci (pneumonia germs) simply by feeding them on pneumonia virus and making other minor modifications in their environment. And when Rosenow reversed the procedure and fed pneumonia germs on pus, the quickly changed into streptococci. Many other expirements we carried on, and, in every instance, the germs, regardless of type, changed into other types when their food and environment were altered. - Journal of Inefctious Diseases 14: 1-32 (1914)
"In other words, Rosenow found that various strains of bacteria “or what one might call sub-sub species of them, could when suitably treated, become any of the other strains.” - Walene James: Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth 46
And has that experiment been proven or debunked? quoting an observation from 100 years ago doesnt get you very far unless you can show that int he 100 years since experiments have consistently proven it to be true... you do realize 1919 medicine without any reflection on the 100 years of evidence after that is not proving anything right? What do the other 100 years of experiments say?
When did I say I didnt?
More importantly though, I'm not the one trying to make a convincing case, you are. Do you really expect people to go off and invest time in researching an outlandish claim that relies on the entire world of scientists being in on some perpetual conspiracy theory for 100 years without strong evidence to back that up?
Your evidence is one random guy from 100 years ago who claimed to observe something, before they even had the tools to make good tests in the first place. No one is going to go research your flat-earth level bullshit off of one random dude 100 years ago saying he saw something as your "evidence"
I'll give you an example.
Once i was watching random YouTube videos about air rifles and I saw a comment where this dude claimed that Lewis and Clark did their expedition using air rifles that were capable of firing multiple large caliber rounds at great distances before pumping more pressure into the tank.
There were dozens of comments from people saying how much of an idiot and how wrong he was etc.
I decided i was going to give it a look and there it was. Right on Wikipedia.
So it's up to you, you can pick up bits and pieces from places that don't spell it out for you and run with it. Or you can continue waiting for everyone to do the research for you and telling you what to believe.
When deciding who's story you want to believe, just remember... The ones that profit most (not just monetary) are the ones that are more likely to fabricate information.
See you later. Muted
> Real intelligence comes from the ability to learn things from anywhere.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA including 100 year old random dude in his basement that turned out to be wrong and consistently disproven for 100 years..
Thats not learning, thats called cherry picking. When you try to evaluate something is true or not so you side with weak, disproven evidence and ignore mountains of counter evidence all because the weaker evidence makes your case.. no thats not learning, thats reinforcing your stupidity.
There would be nothing wrong with learning from someones insight 100 years ago in and of itself, but not when it means ignoring much stronger evidence from the 100 years that followed.
>There were dozens of comments from people saying how much of an idiot and how wrong he was etc.
> I decided i was going to give it a look and there it was. Right on Wikipedia.
Except there is one big, and very important, difference between this example and the one from earlier.. In this case you didnt just see some crazy theory and accept it. You went on to wikipedia, did **research** to confirm it, looked at the history, the evidence, and actually changed your mind.
Your earlier example I pressed you for exactly that, to show the evidence in the 100 years that followed that supported or denied the claim (which would potentially actually make a case for you if you werent making easily debunked nonsense claims), you provided none... So what you have here is a very different situation, you heard some crazy sounding nonsense, and without aquiring any evidence to support it just assumed it was true cause it make your assumptions sound correct...
> So it's up to you, you can pick up bits and pieces from places that don't spell it out for you and run with it. Or you can continue waiting for everyone to do the research for you and telling you what to believe.
Been there, done that. Already heard people claiming the nonsense like people like you. Gave them all the consideration, heard all their evidence, researched every point made.. it turned out to be a bunch of morons who didnt know a damn thing and was easily debunked.
The problem is you dont accept that, you just assume because someone doesn't believe the same stupid uneducated bullshit as you that they "didnt do the research".. beleive what you like, doesn't make you any less of a moron.
> See you later. Muted
Thank you, very much appreciated that you are saving me the time (and proving your inability to back up your bullshit)... Please be sure to carry through on this, I dont want to see you messaging me and this turning out to be a lie.
