Exactly, when you say "de-abstract money back to what it really is: food" you are really just saying "wealth"... so yes, when you stop viewing the number of dollars you are having as meaningful and instead look at how much **wealth** you have then slow healthy inflation is good
No it doesnt.. your employer pays you the same wealth as inflation happens... Thus the amount of food people can buy as inflation happens remains stable (assuming there are no other effects at play).
Price of food goes up but as I showed the average hourly wage of the population also goes up by an equal amount. So you can buy the same amount of food post-inflation.
> if i put 100$ in a crate and come back in 2 years, i get less apples than in the timeline i didn't wait two years.
1) No responsible person puts a large amount of wealth in a crate for 2 years, first thing anyone who learns money management learns is you do not keep any more than a small emergency fund as cash, the rest should be in investments, at a minimum a mutual fund.
2) We dont **want** people keeping money in crates for long periods of time. That is devastating to the economy as it causes economies to go stagnant as no one is using money to advance knowledge or build newer, better, and cheaper things.
3) Money is **not** and never was intended to be a long-term store of wealth, it is intended to be a short-term store of wealth.
Therefore inflation is good on the above counts, it discourages people hoarding large piles of cash, ensuring a healthy economy, and ensuring everyone benefits from the growing economy.