imagine enacting a :blobcatphoto: but quinn over misreading a grammatical structure

@icedquinn It wasnt about the gramatical structure, it was about the incorrect facts it inferred (which were still incorrect once you corrected your wording).

@freemo i didn't correct the wording because it wasn't structured wrong to begin with :blobcatpuffyhuh:

@icedquinn Either way, your statement was incorrect.. there is no meaningful link between SAr-COV-2 and the common cold

@freemo i also didn't claim there was :blobcatpuffyhuh:

i said the ones we know about have a lot of mutations, therefore inferred they are highly mutatable.
@icedquinn @freemo From what I've seen, SARS-CoV-2 actually mutates quite slowly, certainly slower than influenza or any number of cold coronaviruses
Follow

@allison

Depends what you call mutation. Influenza is a DNA based virus. It doesnt mutate in the usual sense of the word, it undergoes recombination. Coronavirus is an RNA based virus so it cant really undergo recombination efficiently so it will mutate much more slowly.

@icedquinn

@freemo afaik we also use a very retarded testing strategy that doesn't really have the ability to detect mutagen rates. the strain could have existed since forever and the PCRs wouldn't know.

@allison

@icedquinn

Depends.. testing on a large scale doesnt really sequence the genome every single time. so yea, in that sense your right, we dont really test on a global and massive scale the mutation of every blood sample.

But we do have accurate ways to test mutations and we apply this by sampling smaller populations since thats the only way we could afford to do it.

Thankfully sampling smaller populations and inferring the rate on the whole population, when done correctly, can be fairly accurate.

@allison

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.