>So your criticism of your theory is that you might actually be too correct, and doubt yourself too much and your theory is in fact even more correct than you thought.
>
>Ok.. I think that answers my question regarding your character in considering your own mistakes or incorporating contrary ideas to your own. Thanks.

HOW MUCH OF A FUCKING ASSHOLE DO YOU HAVE TO BE TO SAY SOMETHING LIKE THIS!? @freemo YOU'RE A FUCKING PRICK

SHOOT YOURSELF IN THE FUCKING FACE YOU WORTHLESS FUCKING PRICK

@coyote I treat people, generally, with the same respect they treat me. Its no worse that the statements he made.. except mine has the virtue of the fact of being honest and straightforward, not attacked for the sake of attacking

@freemo No you do not, your own thread proves otherwise, and your own words. You hold yourself in high regard enough to think you're being honest and straightforward. Why not honestly and straightforwardly admit you're wrong, or address the points quinn, meowski, or I made? Your replies contain no evidence or claims of your own, and you've been a pedantic, self-righteous asshole from the beginning.

Open your fucking eyes man, you're a prick, a dick, and asshole, a douchebag, a fucking idiot to boot.

@coyote I've already explained several times why I wont address your points... because you have both demonstrated that if I did neither of us would be able to derive any value from your contribution regardless of the conclusion.

@freemo then don't address mine, address anyone elses, if you could have you would have though, it's obvious you can't.

@coyote I have addressed other peoples points on this subjects (in fact ones that are identical to the ones meowski made) hundreds of times over... So yea, already have. Just not going to repeat that with the moron parade we got going here.

@freemo "I could address those points, but I won't because you're wrong"

How do I know this is a cope, tell me how I know

@freemo The only one here assuming they are right is you, everyone else engaged with you earnestly and honestly, if you feel you're so correct

@freemo then it should be easy to disprove, instead of relying on pedantry, semantics, and insults, maybe you should just state what you feel is the obvious

@coyote These points are very easy to disprove. As I stated I have disproved the exact same ideas countless times... But since i already know from past discussions neither you nor meowski can or will change or improve your ideas based on outside information it would be impossible to prove it **to you**. You simply are not capable of recognizing or integratng proof, so i wont continue to try. Let alone when all you can do is insult people repeatidly when they make the attempt anyway.