🇳🇱
No its not, not even close. VARES is where you report any incident that has the **possibility** of being an adverse reaction.. It is not encouraged nor required that such incidents be verified as having a causal relationship. That is figured out after using the techniques I described already.
Patently false, in fact the public policy explicitly states this as false. They are required to report certain types of incidents even if they know it isnt caused by the vaccines (because that is needed for the data to be reliable)..
The law requires VARES reporting to a whole host of situations even when it is known that there is no cause effect.. So yes, it is well established VARES contains tons of reports not related causally to the vaccine.
No, when doctors are required by law to report many events even when it is known that it was unrelated to the vaccine it is pretty extreme to say "few"... these laws have pretty wide swaths too.
In fact the vast majority of types of incidents in VARES would have been required by law to be reported by a doctor even if the doctor knew it wasnt caused by the vaccine...
It shows you havent worked with VARES data in the past, it doesnt work like you think it does.
They are literally required by law to not follow what you just said.
LOL No they dont.. most doctors follow the law and report on VARES anything even remotely notable.
Also the law that requires them report to VARES even when there is no causality is **unique** to the COVID vaccine as such laws were instituted as part of the national emergency. As such it would ina nd of itself explain why the reporting increased.
but you keep thinking the vaers has all sorts of unrelated events