@MandyJane Basically a user refused to untag him in a post then he threatened to sue us for violating CAN-SPAM laws.
@mk @MandyJane @alex freemo is making it seem like the behavior never changed tho
@mk @MandyJane @alex He got upset I didn’t call you a TERF and it went downhill from there I guess
Convo was largely civil tho, it wasn’t like it turned into a hellthread. He just doesn’t seem to like y’all very much
🇳🇱
When did I "get upset"... I said it was not particularly accurate. Never said or indicated I was upset.
@freemo @alex @MandyJane @mk Perhaps that was uncharitable, apologies. Maybe it would have been more accurate to say that you were irked by it?
Not even irked, I think your reading too much into it. It just seemed non-descript and vague.
Perhaps you are confusing my clear negative views of the server as a whole with me pointing out the inaccuracy.. You would be correct to state that I am irked by the management of spinster, but that didnt come up till later in the convo.
@freemo @alex @MandyJane @mk Perhaps. Although nothing I put in the article was inaccurate, IIRC you said it was needlessly vague or generalistic to call mk a radical feminist, not incorrect
In fact I'd even go so far as to say that calling spinster a radicalized group is completely factual. It just leaves out the important aspect as to what beleifs they hold that crosses the line to be considered radical.
It was a critique that details were missing, nothing more. At least not until the discussion evolved into why they are the only instance to ever be silenced by QOTO.
@freemo @alex @MandyJane @mk All of that info would probably be better left to the actual #Spinster page, which I haven’t gotten around to working on yet. I don’t think more than a cursory mention of mk’s involvement with #Spinster is necessary as far as her page is concerned.