I already predicted (in private circles and with friends) that the experiment in would go awry and end up being a net loss in PR for crypto in general.

This is my new prediction:

**Before the end of this year, we will have evidence that at least one relevant person or organisation with an anti-bitcoin agenda in the short term (ill-)advised the Salvadorean government or their contractors, or actively worked on this new legislation or its technical implementation, with the goal of damaging the reputation of , causing a price drop, or delaying/preventing endorsement or adoption by other governments or by big companies.**

This could be (eg): a financial regulator or watchdog in a developed country with an interest in preserving the status quo, an investment fund trying to groom the market before going all in, a “whale” who is short (even privately) on BTC, a large bank with an interest in boycotting, some resourceful think tank or non-profit with a strong conservative or progressive bent, etc.

Follow

@tripu wouldnt surprise me if this was the case, though im not sure it will necessarily surface with public evidence.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.