Someone asked, "Who gets to decide what gets moderated on the Fediverse? And who decides what's seen or unseen?"

You do!

If you don't like someone, block them!

If you don't like an instance, block it!

If you don't like your instance, leave it!

If no instance is to your liking, start your own!

If you don't like other instances, de-federate them!

If you don't like federation itself, turn it off!

Ultimately, the Fediverse gives you the freedom of association—exercise it as you see fit.

On another note, I'm noticing a lot of trolls coming here recently—and they're not happy about being moderated.

I have no doubt some may try methods to skirt moderation.

But I also suspect most will give up and leave.

When trolls find out that I'm generally pro-moderation, they give me a big lecture about free speech and bubbles and silos—and how we should listen to """everyone""".

When they go on about this, my natural conclusion is, "Okay, they're not talking about a hypothetical—they *know* they're going to be moderated eventually but are trying to postpone the inevitable."

Trolls, themselves, don't tend to believe in listening to everyone.

They're certainly not looking for debate.

To them, a discussion is not even about uncovering a truth or—more unsubtlely—being right or wrong.

It's about winning or losing.

From a troll's perspective, all interactions are a game with a desired outcome: winning.

In order to deal effectively with trolls, you can't even let them play their game.

As someone else pointed out, trolls might not be strategic in their interactions.

They want to inflict pain and hurt—and will do whatever that enables their pursuit.

This is why I call this a "game".

It may not be a literal game like Monopoly but the effect is the same: a zero sum outcome for which they hope you will lose.

But just because a troll may lack foresight, doesn't mean you have to.

It's worth asking, "When this person talks to me, what's their goal?"