@unabomber it's it really fair to call it a civil war, tho? Jesus wouldn't lie... Right?
I can understand calling it a civil war that emerged in response to the overthrow of the government by a foreign power (US/NATO). The only thing that makes zero sense is the other guy implying the US never invaded and Ukraine simply accidentally fell down.
@ryan
Nah, he's lying. He already gave himself away.
He knows the US playbook. Dozens of times since WW2, but he already admitted he knows about Syria.
We curate and fund a violent overthrow of a democratically elected government that disagrees with America-owning oligarchs, solidify the position, then stand back and give "aid" for the "civil war"...
It's tired. But it works, and ppl buy it. They even pretend like it's something it's not.
@ryan @jazzilla @freemo For us it is like debating which sports team is the best:
New York Yankees vs. Boston Red Sox
Los Angeles Lakers vs. Boston Celtics
Liverpool vs Manchester United
We focus on winning this online debate this weekend.
But out there in Syria and Ukraine people are dying and USA/NATO has not succeeded to make Russia stop doing this.
🇳🇱
Meanwhile the Ukrainians are wondering what nonsense your making up about a Civil war that never happened and they understand the reality quite well without any of the nonsense your proposing, which is just pure fiction.
There is nothing to win... I had "won" before the debate ever began because these arent issues that are even in debate outside of you rmind and perhaps a few russians.
But you are right, the Ukrainians are wondering about far more serious things than your conspiracy theory gibberish.
