🇳🇱
> Now why on earth would you ask me to cite a source you then discount for credibility?
> Seems a fools errand.
Because your goal shouldnt be to win an argument, it should be to exam the truth together. The fact that you think it has less value because it might be debunked is exactly the problem, the idea that some information you provide might be debunked should make you more eager to share it, not less.
> How about you figure out what to compare our economy to, so we understand what is being compared?
We know quite well what to compare it to. We compare it to itself at an earlier point if we are looking to see if someone or something is improving it or not.
> I’d suggest the ten other largest economies maybe. Or only five.
Why would we do that, it has no relevance to the question at hand. That wouldnt tell you if Biden has improved the economy or hurt it.
> And you skipped all the rest of the things I cited…
You mean the one and only line i didnt directly address? Because those are highly subjective, lack good metrics to evaluate, and are overall a mixed bag, he improved some things and made others much worse. So there didnt seem to be much value hashing that out since it was the only one of your metrics that could be weasled out of due to lack of any objective metric.
