@furgar The explaining in the video is decent / measured / spoken well,

Especially if you focus on just the definition of what he's explaining regardless of it being true or not.

The interviewer tries to interrupt / personalise or cross-relate to other things, but he's right to finish to show the marriage thing from *his* perspective, which at the end you can understand from his perspective.

And his "a worm in an apple doesn't make that part of the definition of apple" is quite good on top of that. Mentioning contexts might not change the definition.

So if you can drop the topic specifically or outcomes of this video a bit more, you might see the way he is talking is rather good (again without supporting or disapproving opinion).

You can see what he means in a few mins AND without a big 'show' or diving into different personal or distraction examples (which for 'selling people more' watching time probably is extended often and helps to give them more airtime / attention).

It's like a dictionary definition according to him and that is concise.

It may need a lot less TV time if people could explain like this more often.

Post was inspired by this video
(clicking this post for those that don't see video, will help you see all comments or click link below)
https://noagendasocial.com/@furgar/108607753169574078