A lot of things have no value in STEM.

And failing the above only focuses almost on itself meaning it's relativity and application is without other parts of life involved and so detrimental in making a tool without such questions as:

- "is it really needed?"
- "shouldn't we care with more people involved and ask them also?"
- should this be profited from or so heavily subsidised by those with a bad track record
- Are these values really representing people's views or wants?
- What is the real problem if we already had a solution or Mark 2 jet and now we need more and more faster and faster?

I believe this to be one of the reasons why STEM excels and is appreciated by the government as it's aligned with not caring about doing the people work or equalising planet or people in it (shrug not my government-controlled job).

Profit-orientated and funded (etc) all ties into more profit and skewed stuff... even if they are shiny.