Those who care too much have to also realise that when it's too much for others they need to moderate their actions with those who feel it more or act on it more rather than those that care less.
It's pushy and even aggressive-like to alarm others who simply don't care so much or see problems much or can't see it long-term.
For example - My 'cause' (our humanity) is relative to survival and ethics *but still* it can be seen as aggressive by others to care so much even if it's about being cheated out of life / unable to escape traps, not having consent etc... so people need time and hopefully crisis first before reality comes to the foreground.
(Not sure about the last line, but ignoring things and constant parts of reality = crisis... and then after that people can work on it)
@raimondaslapinskas
I think this also natural that people won't do or can't see reasons to help save planet until it is literally gone. Many things people don't do early enough follows this line...
It's like a lot of people who on a simple level don't know how to maintain their car or even themselves - so they wait until it literally breaks until they *must* stop everything or have to go to doctor (which is hard in 'busy' design of life or unpaid to care for yourself so also doesn't help)
So it is a main strength and weakness that WE (humanity) will *tolerate* a lot before doing...
and still those that care don't know what to do against scale and machines...
most just 'busy' / unpaid to think about Amazon massively gone or Masai people as the next being pushed out.
So we will tolerate even living in the mud again... and inversely I think it's EXACTLY proportional to how most people wouldn't jump in front of a train to opt -out or end their suffering or get out of the traps of life. We will tolerate it and even get distracted while those that care like me still haven't cracked it.
The default equation of being alive is so extreme (as I see it) it's an ultimatum of
a) staying alive at almost any cost ( soul / body etc )
or
b) killing yourself
In many cities they do daily kill themselves (I assume from occasional announcement) but obviously more people don't like the idea or dying unless it's more pleasant - Some would like to stay alive for some other reasons too like to keep their mum and dad happy but still it's not respecting them as individual or as suffering person / people with lack of choice)
If really you would ask people if they don't mind dying peacefully in their sleep today... I think many would say "fuck it bye" and just sleep / take a pill. Maybe close a few accounts / tie up loose ends and then just go. You wouldn't even notice (nor would I).
You'd get a lot less posts too.
The painful dying (even at cost of morals prostituting your body or ethics) is often too much of an opt-out even if no other options are available. The difference for me is accepting death but making it painful for the opposing team in terms of will-power and not going so fast with the mainstream flow.
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
On another note about this caring/doing vs. crisis stuff...
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
I think it would help people to die. I read somewhere more people are choosing to go (can pay for it) but could be from many things (but also again we could say that's all cumulative that is humanity has ignorant patterns of life, less real help, and less consent towards individuals than all is meaningless or death but what you do about it is the personal decision).
Happy to hear your view on those main points.
