I'm not really feeling I'm dwelling on it (so check that in yourself for saying). It's more a problem across the board and standard 'breakdown' called 'communication' in it's limited and broken forms.
If I am in slightest dwelling it's most that and because I come across it so often - EVERYONE needs more work on it as good communication is part of good life.
It almost looks like I'm trying to make myself important but not everyone is just mostly kak (as the shortest way to say it, though many here do really well too answer or take internet as 'strange' by nature of people being different or under unwanted pressure generally from systematic patterns making them doubtful. sensitive or dubious about well, everything especially trusting themself and a few others)
So as a common thing and as my experience is what I'm saying that Mr. Stallman has and it's nothing compared to worse conversations I've already mentioned like people asking for contact but then not really asking for contact in many ways...
Maybe you're saying it as a trust basis if we were to talk... so that would make sense and valid in that way - so I would say as long as your accessible and not what I described as avoidant then you're way ahead and much above bad even in the worst case. But be like many of that description (including attempts to resolve it personally or skip audio chats if we did it before) then you might get some general feedback without names / details needed
(most of my profile is my direct experience so I'm not generalising too much and keeping it fairly real). I rank highly not to fall into same traps / habits and keep my experience as 1st hand / less doubtable.
I have contacted almost everyone I've ever met worth considering / every worthy website / even the lesser or long shots... towards genuine relativity I've come across... so do consider that in the future comments even if it's only as my experience that well people are usually scared first (but I don't know all the reasons, I do have lots of dubious replies sometimes more than talking about said topic lol). I have to say Mastodon makes it much easier and sharing... Emails less so.
Maybe we can exchange good Mastodon people! (a short list I'm sure! DM if you want)
So to avoid this turning into your thing - yes in some ways might help not to dwell on what hinders us but actually a lot of what is also happening (Stallman or not) is a kind of non-caring for comms OR caring-but-ignoring or caring-but-overwhelmed or better-not-say caring and basically emotional short-circuiting to even begin with talking.... and that is really similar to how you might tell people about anything taboo.
My best is asking people if they believe in banks: "no" mostly...
and then if they can believe you can go bankrupt - "Not sure"
"Well how about the banks said in 2008 they have very little money and need to take public money... are you ok with that?"
Err,,, watch them run out the room after a quick no realising they are getting cornered...
"They are cheating you/everyone and stole the money"
"What the government says is lies / colluding etc ... etc"
All hysterical perhaps in one go, BUT ONE DAY THE UGLY REALITY MUST THERE and be settled inside our self...
I think you mentioned somewhere banks are neutral but you could maybe ask on what you think of the above typical questions in the " " 's above
---------------------------------
Extended (OPTIONAL READING)
---------------------------------
More about how weak humans are / can get...
People will pretend for this or many examples that it's not happening (anything else more than accepting stuff is going on and unacceptable with *something* that needs doing about more than 'just keep paying' <--- yeah!...
some people already agree bank practices are bad but it's like somehow is forgotten or overlook for other stuff! (crisis / "bail-outs" helps but barely on the radar also which also proves stuff... If I stole money from them direct there might be more of a who-ha or fuss about it - but pay endlessly and it's ok as long as al are duped)
If obvious stuff like that with using / abusing public taxpayer funds or any category of 'bigger than me' doesn't show how this makes people freeze or be in denial then I don't know what else to say.
People just ignore it somehow like someone being robbed and being shocked at what is going on.
You could say we're in lots of type of that that is accumulated trauma or accumulated sensitivity (just takes one false pillar to drop for their concentration to break and blame their pain on you or skip into the other track / narrow vision).
It's just too much for individuals emotionally to comprehend or even start to decide to fight back or admit... or anything...
It's like people doing sport for the first time...
because all their equations or assumptions (+ ignorant parenting) relies on not really knowing any of that... (life based on not knowing - a sad / Shakespeare-like tragedy)
and so even they don't understand life to make a concrete decision - it's all baseless or social aesthetics... and take away that or any pillars that is holding up logic and the whole construct will shutdown (CPU short-circuits / label made).
Of course it's not the banks ^^)
It's like "I'd rather be cheated and pay senselessly than deal with how meaningless life has become without simply acknowledging it publicly"
and yes they will complain every day. (Lemmings let us say, bless them and not looking down on them)
And communication is a bit like that with abuse of power in representing poorly (manipulation) / stealing money / lies / power / control / public money stolen (legal avenues) for private gain... ignoring and systematically ignorant.... basically ingredient for fascism or ANYTHING with HIGH LEVEL OR IGNORING.
It's hard even to admit being taken from and for some better to keep looking down as they walk.
...best not to mention it :)
Just they are emotionally coward or afraid or just don't want trouble etc etc - many things which only takes 1 thing to cause block.
The eventual summary is that the art of skim-reading anyone helps and and your own confidence / direction would help anyone reading any length of text...
but still the minimal is low so I'm not going to pretend about that.
The point is that it feels you assume or have more worried outlook (or did since we are clearing it up now) and often I see this as back-pedalling or even categorising it as hating... but saying what you see can help and also avoids hiding things (which I feel industrially and socially we have done so I use that as higher priority).
Again I reserve the right to moderate and even edit later what I write and mention why I change it.
You and all the readers should also assume there is more than what you see and if I say I've said / cleared all this with Mr. Stallman then no need to defend.
You could check yourself about why you feel need to defend (or consider this the check done ☑️ 
).
No need to drag it longer - I just said it / called it... managing your feelings we could do later IF NEEDED (I would prefer that).
Thanks though, genuinely. And not saying don't write... but consider all is fine and not just a post in the 'hate' category.
