STANDARDISING RESPECT?
STANDARDISING PRIVACY?
...WITH INDIVIDUALS?
CAN IT BE TOTALLY STANDARDISED?
YES AND NO....
Some in some ways the yes is some base foundations but the no is to the individualist nature of people of which there as many combinations as there are people... and then they might mind in some specific formats, channels, situations but totality don't mind in some other ways (principle may get wavered or even opposite for example for wavered for family etc or temporarily put in learning mode rather than strict rule)
So many types of people = many types of respect.
Imagine individualism is detailed and so this posts concern is that YOU CAN'T STANDARDISE PEOPLE WITHOUT DISRESPECTING THEM! LOL
MAN-MADE VS. NATURAL LAW
And then it can become about prioritising law and order or another group's mentality above people as individuals themselves which have a natural law *embedded*)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law
POWER AND CONTROL
I believe most of us already know and see the dangers of others 'upholding' the law or judging it for profit-via-punishment.
Actually more than this I wanted to say
it would be really good to have a way to allow people too see what we prefer and hold that highest in any way of life or system... while people could learn what else to try... not to assume this for people or box them in either... if they are genuine let them try, even to make mistakes, instead of blocking them... I guess most are honest and even others can watch them (as we do now) but in a healthier kind of stewardship / taking care of people/
kind of like a long yes / no list or example from past - this would be great to read!
And assuming it's not going to be all stored for the intention of bad (which of course people would use it for so I don't know what to do about this) then it would be useful for us to match our traits and usages...
NOT WAITING TO MAKE MISTAKES, BEING MORE PROACTIVE ABOUT RESPECT
But instead of waiting for people to take a photo and someone waiving their hand like "no I don't want" it would be better to see people and accept when they do or don't like photos.... in an ideal world...
this needs re-writing but this 'seeing transparently' or loading of preferences I think allows respect and privacy which I think all interconnected here...
feel free er-write this for me!
KEYWORDS
individual
respect
privacy
transparency
(before events happens and before we have to explain why we don't want to do something against our will or other people's who might get offended even if we tell them it's not personal and they still tell us "oh you're just making a big deal out of it" and they carry on anyway without us individual in mind). I think a photo is a good example but politically asking everything I think is eventually a better order of doing things without manipulating them and serving them and the serving the idea that happy people do well in life and do better...
