@mewmew @icedquinn @lucifargundam @p @realcaseyrollins >doesn't understand the reality that tabloids serve a purpose in a functioning society
end your own life
end your own life
@coyote @icedquinn @lucifargundam @p @realcaseyrollins what is the purpose tabloids serve in functioning society?
@Hyolobrika @icedquinn @lucifargundam @p @realcaseyrollins They serve to publish things that no one else will, the scathing seedy underbelly that no one else will talk about
@Hyolobrika @icedquinn @lucifargundam @p @realcaseyrollins When MSM is too spooked, the final choices used to be write a book or tabloids, now luckily we can publish things ourselves on the internet
@Hyolobrika @icedquinn @lucifargundam @p @realcaseyrollins that's honestly half why I'm against censorship is because it solely benefits those who control the (((means))) to communication (in the spook echoes because we've always had a way around this stuff, but normies don't)
Follow
@coyote @icedquinn @Hyolobrika @realcaseyrollins @p I am against censorship as well- I can understand the logic in doing so for certain material/content that would cause the general public to harm themselves, but at the same time- it can be easily misused/abused as a tool with an agenda to manipulate the masses. A negotiation would be for a controlling company who controls such a medium to instead flag instead of censor the content- and hope the public can make wise decisions themselves.
> I can understand the logic in doing so for certain material/content that would cause the general public to harm themselves
I can understand the logic, too, but it's despicable to decide what's best for others to know. (I mean, I can understand the logic in murdering a witness that is going to testify at a corruption trial.) Have a look at what Debs got arrested for.