"GPT-4 scored in the top 1% of test-takers for the Originality of its ideas ... we believe this marks one of the first examples of AI meeting or exceeding the human ability for Original Thinking"
https://theconversation.com/ai-scores-in-the-top-percentile-of-creative-thinking-211598
@iLearn Yep and I have 2 questions...
(1) Why are we assessing the creativity of Humans with Standardised Tests that will obviously score better on Machines?
(2) Why are Humans becoming less creative than Machines? Is there something wrong with us? 🤔
That's a fair point made about the test already having a bias. Got no answer for that 
Though for (2), I don't think humans are becoming less creative than machines. If you're looking at an individual or sets of individuals maybe. People have different thought processes after all.
But with a sample size large enough that shouldn't be the case anymore. And machines scrape those large sample sizes of ideas and spice it up. Humans can't do that.
@lupyuen
I know this is a 'what if' point, but GPT does web scraping and sometimes mixes things up based on what's asked.
So if people had a way to 'learn' like that, would humans catch up?
Interesting read!