@portalresearcher@hachyderm.io @tokyo_0 @det Noting that Google's algorithms have been known to misclassify computer generated images.

Also, David is known to not actually look at the matches from that other tool, for legal reasons, which could mean a certain number of false positives.

Either way, the numbers are actually very small, especially compared to mainstream social media.

The main argument he has is that sites don't use one very specific tool, but otherwise seem to take action.