I've resisted commenting on a few internet control lobbyists. I thought I'd cover this one though:

It was a worry that someone might encounter child porn on the Internet (or something they think is it).

1) It seems to be pretty rare. I suppose if someone spends a lot of time on the Internet, they *might* encounter it, especially over the years. Maybe.

2) I don't understand what the expectation here is supposed to be. It's not realistic for every bad thing on the Internet to never appear...

3) Burning things down simply because something *might* appear doesn't seem very proportionate or rights preserving... It's also unlikely to make a difference, or much of one, but that is secondary to this.