@peterdrake I was thinking about this today - isn't it fairly normal though? Whether it's 57% or 70%, it wouldn't be enough for a conviction under most legal proceedings. Civilian trials generally require jurors to be unanimous for a conviction, and even military trials have a sliding scale which only goes down to 67% for the least severe offences.
Admittedly, this result would elsewhere have resulted in a hung jury and mistrial, resulting in the possibility of retrial, but since Trump can't be indicted again as he's no longer President, it comes to the same thing.
CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.
@peterdrake I was thinking about this today - isn't it fairly normal though? Whether it's 57% or 70%, it wouldn't be enough for a conviction under most legal proceedings. Civilian trials generally require jurors to be unanimous for a conviction, and even military trials have a sliding scale which only goes down to 67% for the least severe offences.
Admittedly, this result would elsewhere have resulted in a hung jury and mistrial, resulting in the possibility of retrial, but since Trump can't be indicted again as he's no longer President, it comes to the same thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hung_jury#United_States