@schnedan Thank you for the technical explanation.
I don't think literally using git to track publications was the main point he was trying to make though.
Just the idea of a system to keep track of versions and reviews.
Bare git would definitely not work for the purpose.
@rastinza
True. It was more on an abstract level. There are many aspects that are probably overshooting what is needed. Others fall short. Just some of the principles that I see when working with code seem applicable and relevant to me, that’s what I wanted to discuss. I am also not sure if all commits in branches need to be tracked. And at other points one could argue, if this isn’t also a waste of resources in terms of sustainability.
@schnedan