#fediverse meta
I wish there was a way to block people from federating replies to my posts, without stopping them following me or seeing my posts. That way I could still feed my progressive reckons into the darker corners of the 'verse, without the risk of exposing the unwary reader to toxic replies from those corners.
#fediverse meta
#fediverse meta
@TiberiusReigns @strypey
My grasp of the idea here is that the goal is still that OP toot will move throughout the fediverse, but that replies wouldn't be treated as first order toots themselves. They might post to the local timeline of the author, and flow back to OP notif, but those replies wouldn't be shared to any other servers than those two.
So source-and-reply instance-only. Might think of as a semi-public DM, in that is direct between only the two instances & no others.
#fediverse meta
@TiberiusReigns @strypey Essentially, this might be understood to extend the concept of consent to replies in a way similar to how a Creative Commons NoDerivs license extends consent to copy a work but not to modify it.
In a threading context, a reply modifies the work of the original author. Marginalia that forever transforms the text into something else.
#fediverse meta
@beadsland @TiberiusReigns @strypey hadn't @mike done thisband more in Hubzilla/Zap/Streams ? @jupiter_rowland
#fediverse meta
@tetrislife
No idea. Got any links to documentation of @mike's implementation of this?
#fediverse meta
@strypey well, I just meant Hubzilla, Zap, Streams :-)
@mike @beadsland @TiberiusReigns @jupiter_rowland
#fediverse meta
@beadsland @strypey let me try it from Hubzilla. I have seen replies in a thread not visible until logging in via magic auth, and maybe even replies without like buttons.