Honest question: how exactly is just using the name of a group of people (marginalised or not), without any epithets or modifiers, disrespectful or offensive? (“because some members of that group have said so” isn't valid).

blog.nativesintech.org/apache-

@tripu I would think that ‘because members of that group have said so’ is a perfectly valid reason.

@avarowell @tripu Is it, though?

To take an extreme example, one will sometimes encounter people who are gay/lesbian people who insist "homosexuality is a choice". Do we immediately accept that as the collective opinion of all gay/lesbian people, or do we ask if it's representative of the majority?

@hughster @tripu My dudes, it’s just a brand name. Besides, I recon the only people qualified to debate this ain’t here to do so. It’ll all play out as it will.

Follow

@avarowell

> _“It’s just a brand name.”_

Precisely. Why all the fuss?

> _“The only people qualified to debate this ain’t here to do so.”_

Linguists? Historians? Psychologists? Lawyers?

/cc @hughster

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.