I’m not yet convinced that I need Kudos, but @ACM thinks it’s a good idea, so let’s see… Testing it with the latest paper I wrote with @CerstinMahlow, “Academic writing and publishing beyond documents.”
@true_mxp @ACM @CerstinMahlow
Hm. Isn’t that why you wrote an abstract for your paper?
@clausatz @CerstinMahlow @ACM Well, that’s one of the reasons why I’m not sure this is really needed.
As a tool for science journalists, I guess the “showcase” (https://www.growkudos.com/showcase/publishers/acm) and lay summaries can be useful. But I’m not sure whether it makes sense to have another platform that is structured around *publishers*.
