Am I misunderstanding something?
This appears to be a stunningly irresponsible story in Science, claiming that up to 30% of the scientific literature is fake.
https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-scientific-papers-are-alarmingly-common
Below, the first two paragraphs of the story.
h/t @Hoch
Follow
@ct_bergstrom @Hoch Just to add to the pile on for the worst decision tree ever - if he had just classified every paper as positive, he would have had perfect sensitivity and a slightly degraded (50%) alarm aka false positive rate.
