Jared Kushner Has No Right To Be Playing Diplomat: ‘If the president’s son-in-law wants to have authority over U.S. foreign policy, he must face Congress. That’s why we’re suing to demand it.’ https://www.byteseu.com/2461144/ #America #Politics #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #US #USPolitics #USA #USAPolitics
Trump created a syndicate, a state within the state, with no control not checks and balances...
@xs4me2 in the US design of government, SCOTUS can't cover the president. That's not how the system works.
The president is held accountable by the folks we elect to Congress. SCOTUS has little to do with that interaction.
If we elect people who will impeach the president, then they'll do so regardless of what SCOTUS thinks about it. If they won't, then again, they won't regardless of what SCOTUS thinks.
Too often politicians refuse to hold Trump accountable but try to shift blame to SCOTUS for their own failures. We need to soundly tell them no.
More importantly, what's NOT happening.
Have the people we elected to Congress impeached Trump and removed him from office? No.
That's the way forward, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the Supreme Court. This SCOTUS fingerpointing is irrelevant distraction. It makes for good drama and clickbait, but it's up to a different branch of government to remove the guy.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/5334/text
Forget the judicial branch internal processes, how about this link from current events where Congress actively empowered Trump to waive Russian sanctions?
Again, this is up to Congress, not the courts. They can impeach the guy, but instead they actively empower him.
That can't be said for mere opinions that SCOTUS operates on.
@volkris @byteseu
There is and that is the problem. Trump acts as a dictator or rather as a syndicate ringleader. And yes he should be held accountable, but the handpicked SCOTUS will cover him to a large extent.