I said something similar a few weeks ago, suggesting at some point employers are going to have to reject the CV / Resumes of those on twitter. At the time I was told to hold off on that for a while, which, at the time was a very fair comment.
Fast forward to now and I agree, Can we perhaps share more about WHO is being allowed back on, so this can be shared more widely, at some point people may start to realise that being on twitter is sharing a platform with some VERY nasty people. It just adds evidence to a statement, which I think people here, good journalists, scientists agree evidence is essential.
We don't need explicit details, I have shared just 1 post so far about 1 person who has been allowed back on, we need more, but I would rather also share more posts about positive content, science mostly, but have shared about the Books in education story and updated it with the Dakota idea of expanding this to public libraries.
Good point nothing wrong with sharing what is going on, So people are aware (main stream news like the BBC don't seem to report it) can make a choice, esp if we also share the good stuff that is on here too, and share a lot more of that. Shows we have something better here.
Right! But too I don't want to be too absolutist/righteous either. I'm not after purity of thought, etc. And of course I would miss some posts that met the filter criteria that I would want to see... so I've not implemented it, and I'm waiting, and as I wait, the annoying posts decline, so once again, maybe, the correct action to take, is none! lol so much easier...
Hail Eris.
@zleap