I wish my high school and undergraduate courses had taught through the lens of instead of keeping it all abstract. I'm relearning a lot of it now that way, and it actually makes sense and "sticks" because the equations describe real things and I have a reason to know them.

@2ck You learned the proper way, the way filled with proofs. Nothing matters unless it can be proven. The rigor strengthens the mind.

@AmpBenzScientist That's a false dichotomy, you can have proofs *and* proper motivating examples. They don't even have to be physics, there are other ways in which calculus represents parts of the world. @2ck

Follow

@timorl @2ck It is irrelevant if people have different views on Calculus. What matters is that it is presented as theory with rigorous proofs. Mathematics is a field based on proofs. What I stated was not false as theory is required for proper application. It is true that Calculus like operations were being used before the discovery of Calculus. Euler's Method is a good example of this. There are problems that have been proven to not have a solution.
In summary, Theory and rigorous proofs are the foundation. Examples and applications should logically follow after this.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.