I keep thinking about what we get backwards. Measuring learning loss instead of loss of learning access and loss of learning resources. Fascinated by whether LLMs understand why some answers are wrong and not with whether our tests are designing unclear overlapping categories of answers that confuse test takers. Deciding kids are "addicted" to screens when we reduce the world to roads and kill our trees and parks.
@grimalkina you’re asking the right questions here, appreciate the thoughtfulness
@darkuncle like most scientists I usually feel like I'm better at questions than answers :), this is kind affirmation thank you
@grimalkina asking the right question is about 80% of getting to the right answer
@mwyman underrated film <3
@darkuncle I know folks complained it wasn’t based enough on the book, but I thought it was actually a quite good adaptation of the last story.
@mwyman everybody always complains about film adaptations lacking fidelity (the nerd outrage around Lord of the Rings is still memorable decades later), but retelling a story in another medium *requires* changes - and it’s the thrust of a story that matters more than specific details, most of the time
Argument? I think we're on the same page. My beef with the Peter Jackson movies is *he could have done better*. It's like the 9.9 score in gymnastics - great, but you almost had perfection, and you had to throw in breakdancing wizards and dwarf bowling for the cheap laugh?
And YES A THOUSAND TIMES YES getting back to the original subject - the trick is asking the right questions. +1 insightful. Is why the LLM is doomed to be a tool and not a talent - no insight. It does not grok the fullness.
And you didn't subtweet. You subTOOTed. Kids today.
