@ravirockks
I expect paywalls must needs to be factored into those stats or it's a #FAIL
@ravirockks
Your stats are telling you that I'm just reading the stats with information considered.
@ClaraListensprechen4 Of course (we remember that famous Republic poll done via landline phones), but I was broadening your point re the decline of news consumption because of more news going behind paywalls.
@ravirockks
Ah, I see now. This is the ongoing snag: news needs to be paid for and an informed voter needs the information to base a vote on. Paywalls prevent circulation of information beyond people with money and poor people vote too.
Additionally, no news org can claim to be an influencer of the public based on wide circulation when its paywalls curtail such circulation. No other business has Constitutional protection but that one does because it's essential for the people. A paywall is not in keeping with the purpose of why we have a First Amendment regarding the press.
@ClaraListensprechen4 Well-said.
To add, news companies aren't trusts established for the benefit of the public. They're companies that need to make money.
If only they'd stop with the self-righteous chest-beating about defending democracy and were clearer about the corporate governance drivers of their behaviour.
@ravirockks
Bingo.
@ClaraListensprechen4 Are you telling me folks who are under the pump with inflation and interest rates will not be happy to pay for news?
WHAT!?