Show newer

@fulelo objectively the least guilty of the 4, but still way too light a sentence.

@dannotdaniel @waitnwallflower@tooters.org

💀
|{I}\_ :americandragon:
I/ \
/_ /_

I was going to just cut to the chase and add the eggplant, but the dragon was too cute.

@TurboKitty Even when the less worse candidate openly tells people "nothing will fundamentally change", this concept still flies over the heads of the voters

@greenhombre @pbump , I think this is what drives many human activities, even ones that are against your self interest.

I think the guy (gal?) was anti union. Best guess. Second guess he worked for Blizzard and was part of the Cosby rape room scandal.

Show thread

@gratefuldread , arm yourselves. Move in groups. Film everything.

This is my advice for all minorities.

That was weird. I just got a notification "Enjoy this block". No explanation, just a block from someone I never heard of. I am not an airport, no need to announce your departure. I don't even know who you were. There is nothing to enjoy or despair over.

@KT @talia_christine , I don't get it.... I just don't think that way, I suspect. Learning moment for me... But I still don't understand. My 1st thought jumps to violation of contracts, having people available on site 24/7. And not paying to have on call status... THAT I can wrap my head around. My great greats were coal miners, and lived in a company town.

@talia_christine @KT , I don't get it... why sexual harassment? Is this akin to the Cosby room that Blizzard had???

@flexghost , I think I need a lawyer to translate her argument... to me it reads that "if trump committed crimes in another district, I should still be the one who sits as judgement"? That doesn't seem to make any sense at all...

@freemo @HeavenlyPossum @trinsec Same. It is getting circular, but good points all around.

But last words: YER RONG!!!

@freemo @HeavenlyPossum @trinsec those penalties are imposed by law. Once again, you are arguing against big government. And I agree with you, but the issues you raise are almost exclusively because of a lack of free markets. Or the existence of cronyism. Not any advantage of others working under the same system.

@HeavenlyPossum @freemo @trinsec , this argument is strong, and where it diverges from unions is that unions can't keep merging, because the labor market keeps changing. You get 40 years out of a person, tops, and then have to find new mergers, and you have to compete with other labor markets to make those mergers. Endlessly.

It just isn't a level playing field. Labor is easily replaced. It IS replaced.

@freemo @HeavenlyPossum @trinsec

"can force EMPLOYEES to join"

But you can work in a different industry, or work for yourself, or work for a competing firm. And your employer can chose to not sign an exclusive contract, or can choose to sign those exclusive contracts... At least in a free market. Most states limit the market. The problem isn't the unions or the companies in those cases, but cronyism,.

@freemo @HeavenlyPossum @trinsec Exactly, which is why I said "Although I doubt this is true, the numbers show it. "

The actual reason is that those nations are free market, and unions are a example or indicator of free market economics. No unions, not free markets. Free markets, you get unions.

Show older
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.