I know this article and the intended interesting part of the kohberger murder case is supposed to be the genetic forensics, but I found how they used the absence of his phone data useful notable as well. Hiding is hard, and sometimes stands out more. slate.com/technology/2023/01/b

@hacks4pancakes If anything, this should show that the real-world execution of a capital crime is so complex and entropy-reliant, that even a studied person tripped up in multiple ways.

@hacks4pancakes It certainly doesn't seem like one of the things you'd be casual about in a fully planned murder, no.

@SwiftOnSecurity @hacks4pancakes The “best” interpretation is that he was new to murder and despite being sociopathic enough to murder strangers and training in relevant fields he was nervous and made mistakes.

Worse would be that he finally tripped up and there will be more in his past once people look hard enough. 😣☹️

Follow

@georgewherbert @SwiftOnSecurity @hacks4pancakes you're assuming he's even the murderer. Let's not forget: Innocent until proven guilty. No one has been convicted of being the murderer.

@JoshuaACasey @SwiftOnSecurity @hacks4pancakes I’m assuming that for the sake of useful conversations. Innocent until proven guilty is in legal criminal sense. It doesn’t require everyone to always speak like they’re innocent. All speculation carries an implicit “assuming prosecution proceeds and he’s found guilty”. I’m not vaguely in the jury pool….

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.