@xehatug

Prove it.

@Pat
PROOF:
COVID-Math test (level: 5th garder + - * / and compare bw two numbers):

Here after the curve of the death from 1982 to 2020
the principle is simple:
❶ For 1 dead, U do +1
❷ At the end of the year, U sum
❸ Do it again for each year
It is very simple, isn't it?

https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/2383440

The demo could stop there...

But U want to continue?
good
Q: how many death for 2020?

@Pat
So did U get the number of death for 2020?

NOW COMPARE WITH THE # tooted by serious MEDIA above
🔘THE MEDIA
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/26/world/europe/france-covid-lockdowns.html
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/frances-covid-19-death-toll-breaches-100000-casualty-mark-2021-04-15/
https://apnews.com/article/travel-pandemics-coronavirus-vaccine-health-coronavirus-pandemic-a2de56c022e9e80f085824169a7a4218/gallery/78dc2e566b5b4aaeb3fd20198019cc82
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-15/france-surpasses-100-000-covid-deaths-after-slow-lockdown-action

That is the reason WHY I have not reopen Reuters or AP, since then.

@Pat
❶ Remark: such curve is very difficult to tamper with. There is no ratio, no number U can interpret and U have a little leeway to adjust (a week at the begining and the end of a year).
Why that? bc one's dead or one's not, be at 70% dead doesn't exist. That is as simple as that.

@Pat
❷ Remark: The USA stat based on the same methodology is to be released soon.... for the mid-term....SURPRISED SURPRISED
I think that they will only release upon a short time window (not starting from the 80') to do not show the trend (or the reduce it)...will see

@xehatug

Those data do not support your claim.

@Pat

sorry...the point 1 was missing..
My bad

Hereafter, the global number of ☠since 80'(in France)
the principle is simple:
❶ For 1 dead, U do +1
❷ At the end of the year, U sum
❸ Do it again for each year

https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/2383440

Q: how many death for 2020

@Pat

Remark: such curve is very difficult to tamper with. There is no ratio, no number U can interpret and U have a little leeway to adjust (a week at the begining and the end of a year).
Why that? bc one's dead or one's not, be at 70% dead doesn't exist. That is as simple as that.

@Pat
THEN...The USA stat based on the same methodology is to be released soon.... for the mid-term....SURPRISE

@Pat

So did U the # of ☠ for 2020?
I let U compare with those of the media...:
🔘THE MEDIA
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/26/world/europe/france-covid-lockdowns.html
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/frances-covid-19-death-toll-breaches-100000-casualty-mark-2021-04-15/
https://apnews.com/article/travel-pandemics-coronavirus-vaccine-health-coronavirus-pandemic-a2de56c022e9e80f085824169a7a4218/gallery/78dc2e566b5b4aaeb3fd20198019cc82
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-15/france-surpasses-100-000-covid-deaths-after-slow-lockdown-action

@Pat
I let U comment this image...
Hope that what U think (or not is not coming from this kind of source bc they seem to do not be able to reach a elementary level of mathematics (4 grader))