I should be familiar with UTF16, as I worked multi-lingual programming but I have been retired for a while - UTF8 is or was the standard we worked with.
@Paulos_the_fog it's just utf 8 but with 16 bit characters. So you don't get the effienciency of single bytes for Latin text that UTF-8 has, but you also don't get the "1 character = 1 codepoint" convenience of UTF-32. It is basically the worst of all possible worlds.
CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.
@Paulos_the_fog it's just utf 8 but with 16 bit characters. So you don't get the effienciency of single bytes for Latin text that UTF-8 has, but you also don't get the "1 character = 1 codepoint" convenience of UTF-32. It is basically the worst of all possible worlds.