Follow

More on ChatGPT

Editor of Science also says no to ChatGTP authorship (following on from Nature's recent ground rules stating no LLM tool will be accepted as a credited author on a research paper)

science.org/doi/10.1126/scienc

science.org/doi/epdf/10.1126/s

@Renshaw01

Thorp's blanket ban on any text generated by AI, his non-standard definition of "plagiarism", and the inconsistencies between the policy and the ICMJE rules (which Science as party to) are certainly raising eyebrows.

I just posted our analysis of AI-authorship over at : sentientsyllabus.substack.com/ - though this is not a direct response to recent editorial policy. Apparently, it's harder than one would think to get this right.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
CleverLibre Social

CleverLibre Social is an inclusive social instance for open discussion, learning, and community.
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.