I re read your article two time just to be sure and.. nothing wrong with it.
Sorry, my reaction is inexcusable. To be fair it was around 23 when I posted that but still, I should have took the time to read the article from top to bottom and properly analyze what it was about.
It’s possible I was not in the right mindset, at first, I thought that it was written by a non programmer, I don’t know why. A non programmer trying to “teach” programmers how to think about their projects. Nonetheless I shouldn’t have reacted like I did.
After a re read, this morning, it is clear that the goal of your article was instead, as someone (you) who works in the field, to explore a new perspective of how the act of programming actually translates in the real world. And in fact you did great on that matter.
Again, I’d like to apologize. First of all for the harshness of my reaction and for not having took the time to read and understand your article. I’d like to apologize as someone who also write (much less ambitious) articles. It is obvious that I wouldn’t want people to criticize my work the way I criticized yours.
I would be relieved if you were to accept my sincere apologies.
Have a nice day.
PS: your website is pretty cool.
Don't worry @jenny, I really appreciate people who have different perspective from my own. And life trained me very very well to not be easy to offend. So there is really nothing to apologize.
If you see something not clear or something that might upset you in my articles always feel free to challenge me.
You might be right! 😉
As a hacker, I'm always curious about how other people see the world.
Each of us is constrained in time, space and intelligence: we shouldn't compete, we shouldn't fight, but collaborate to get a better understanding of the world we live in.
So really, don't worry! 😉
You are welcome!
And if you find something you don't like in my writing feel free to ask. Questions are the most powerful tools a person have to build a better world.
